About

Download

  • A free mini-guide on how to blog a conference in detail, by Ethan Zuckerman and Bruno Giussani.

Search LoIP

  • Web LoIP

Get LoIP per email

  • Enter your email address:

Non-profit

Books by Bruno Giussani

Current reading/Atoms

« Contemporary priorities | Main | Average webpage size tripled in five years »

May 24, 2008

From crossmedia to transmedia: thoughts on the future of entertainment

- by Nicoletta Iacobacci, guest blogger

Nicoletta Iacobacci is the Head of Interactive TV/Eurovision at the European Broadcasting Union (EBU).

Television, although originally a one-way (broadcast) medium, has been trying to engage its audience in a two-way experience for several decades.

A children's television programme called Winky Dink and You (CBS 1954) was the first attempt to drive the viewer from passive to active. Since then content providers, despite numerous failures along the way, have been trying to develop programs which create and exploit possibilities to be engaged by and to interact with TV content.
Nowadays the future of entertainment can’t be conceived without enhanced content and multiplatform distribution strategies, matching the media habits of the "Pokemon generation", seamless consumers of games, books, Internet, film and television. The web is the platform which "glues" and allows this multi/enhanced/two-way/mobile entertainment experience. TV has lost its predominant role, and it is now mandatory for broadcasters to embed various forms of interactive technology in their programs and to focus on crossmedia content and transmedia strategies. As Henry Jenkins, director of the Comparative Media Studies Program at MIT and a foremost authority on today’s media environment says: "Media convergence makes the flow of content across multiple media inevitable".

How do crossmedia (Xmedia) and transmedia differ? Both are about content in a multiplatform distribution strategy. Both utilize the web as the main engaging space. Both relate to TV as one, maybe the most important, but just one of the media used to tell the story.

Let's try a definition. In a crossmedia environment, content is repurposed, diversified and spread across multiple devices to enhance, engage and reach as many users/viewers as possible. It is common to call crossmedia "content 360". It is generally the same program re-edited for different screens, fragmented content disseminated on different platforms, possibly incorporating extra content and channels to extend the viewers' experience. Brand here plays a key role and needs to be always identifiable. A typical form of crossmedia is when the plot of the story ends with a call-to-action, and drives the audience across different media. A good example is the BBC's Spooks, where, at the end of the TV episode, a cheerful announcement gives directions to a website.

In transmedia storytelling, content becomes invasive and permeates fully the audience's lifestyle. Stephen Erin Dinehart, who coined the term transmedia and created the VUP (viewer/user/player) relates this model to Richard Wagner and his concept of "total artwork" ("Gesamtkunstwerk") where the spectator becomes actor/player. A transmedia project develops storytelling across multiple forms of media in order to have different "entry points" in the story; entry-points with a unique and independent lifespan but with a definite role in the big narrative scheme.

More concretely, from the originator's perspective, transmedia is content embedded with marketing strategies, where content is treated as “goods” to be franchised. Each franchise should have the goal of expanding the audience experience and drive for more consumption in the overall scheme.

Both crossmedia and transmedia are obviously multimedia approaches, using largely of any available channel, tool and media to tell a story. The difference between the two is to ascribe to a consequent evolution in public demand. Content spread across various media (crossmedia) is no longer satisfying enough, viewers wants more, they are becoming VUPs and in viewing/using/playing want to participate, and to a certain extent create, the story themselves.

Stvmarika The most self-explanatory example of multi/Xmedia/transmedia production is a recent participatory drama by Swedish public television SVT, Marika (site - trailer in English) which won the 2008 iEmmy Awards. Marika included a TV drama series, in-studio debates, online virtual environments, events across Sweden, blogs (picture), chats, fabricated documents and props, forums and mobile games -- and drew the public, and the other mainstream media, into the story. Following the iEmmy Awards win, Marika is creating some turmoil among public broadcasters, but it is also pushing content creators to start daring on innovative productions.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/618177/29420524

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference From crossmedia to transmedia: thoughts on the future of entertainment:

Comments

The subject of crossmedia comes up whenever broadcasters meet to discuss professional matters - it's practically impossible to have a discussion without touching on it. The latest example was the EBU seminar on Media Asset Management on May 22-23 in Geneva. Every discussion included the subject or repurposing video, audio and text across different platforms - including the essential subject of copyright (http://www.ebu.ch/en/union/news/2008/tcm_6-59831.php).

The opportunities and challenges of crossmedia are central to every professional discussion, whener we speak about the present or future of the media. It may be a fad - but it's certainly essential to get the crossmedia aspect right. Large broadcasters like BBC are investing heavily in every aspect of crossmedia.

However, it's the first time I see a good definition of transmedia - and I think I get it now. Well done, Nicoletta.

This distinction is very useful and fits the trend of user-generated-content to pre-formatted content. The multimedia experience is also enlarged to many-media. It is important to bring this new set of narrative and creative possibilities to both users and producers. Cool. Grazie Nicoletta

This is a very nice distinction and definition between XMedia and TMedia-- and the fact that they go hand in hand most of the time... The VUP element is certainly the an important trend that displays itself with emerging social networks as a tv distribution platform as well... Kate Modern in Bebo is another good example I think, where just distribution across different media is not enough, users, viewers, VIEWSERS, as my old friend Gary Arlen coined this term once, want to play an active role in the story across different media... so why not call it Transmedia... it is a good term.

Post a comment

Upcoming conferences