Journalism fellowships: fewer applicants prompt re-thinking

(Note: this post has been updated June 19)

Journalism fellowship programs in many US universities, including Stanford, MIT and Harvard, have suffered a significant drop in applications from American journalists in the last couple of years, reports the New York Times.

Why am I blogging this? Because I was invited to participate in one of those programs, the John S. Knight Fellowship at Stanford, in 2003-2004, and spent an incredibly rewarding and stimulating year there with 18 other Fellows from the US and half a dozen countries around the world.

But the Knight Fellowship at Stanford received only 83 American applications this year, down from 101 in 2006  and 107 in 2005. The Nieman program at Harvard also had 83 applicants, down from 91 in 06 and 110 in 05 had 91 applications, down from 100 in 2006 (see the comment to this post by Nieman curator Bob Giles). Other similar programs at the universities of Michigan and of Maryland were about even.

The impression is that this decline is tied to the rapid changes and increasing uncertainty in the US news media landscape: many newsrooms are scaling back; buyouts and mergers and job cuts are a daily diet in major news organizations, and many journalists are afraid to take a year off their job if they get accepted in a fellowship program, because they're not sure that that job will still exist after the year's over.

It's significant, for example, that the Stanford program did not receive any application this year from employees at the New York Times, the Chicago Tribune, the Los Angeles Times and some other large newspapers (both the Trib and the LAT had Fellows in my class, 2003-04).

In parallel, applications from international journalists were way up -- 132 this year at the Stanford Knight program, for example, compared with 118 last year and 111 in 2004-05. At the Nieman, they received 121 applications in 2006 and 149 in 2007.

As Giles says in his comment, numbers don't tell the whole story: "The quality of the applicant pool gets better every year", he writes. Still, the downward trend in US applications grants a bit of speculation. Journalism fellowships were set up -- the Nieman in 1938, the Knight at Stanford in 1966 -- to serve the needs of a very different news media: a classic newspapers and broadcast landscape, with lifelong careers and steady growth. Journalists would step out one year,  spend it in a university seeking to specialize in a field, to retool themselves, or just to get a rest from the daily deadlines. They would enjoy the intellectual stimulation of the campus and of their peer group of Fellows, and then go back to the same news organization with new energies, new ideas, to become the engines of a betterment of journalism. This was to be the contribution of Fellowships.

Then came the Internet and, well, let's not go into details but things have changed. Increasingly Fellows have seen those organizations changing skin, and often even flesh, while they were away -- particularly those working for newspapers. And that's threatening: if they can go without you for a year, probably they can continue to do so. (And indeed several in different programs got offered buyouts during their fellowship last year).

Let''s be clear: these Fellowships are not broken. But clearly the landscape around them is shifting. So some of them are starting to re-think their role and figure out how they should change to adapt to the new reality and continue pursuing their mission (Knight: "To improve the quality of news and information reaching the public through the news media"; Nieman: "To promote and elevate the standards of journalism in the United States"; I'm mentioning these two because they are the leading journalism Fellowships in the US, but there are many other programs). The Knight Fellowship at Stanford has recently set up a working group -- of which I'm a member -- to help with this process (It's too early to report on our discussions).

At the same time, the increase in applications from international journalists is symptomatic of the growth of vibrant media systems in many countries around the world, that have transitioned or are transitioning to democracy and free market, and of how many journalists in those countries still see a model in the history and the true values of American journalism -- which are somehow being suffocated at home by the news media themselves (24-hours-coverage of Paris Hilton in prison anyone?). By inviting into their programs promising journalists from Africa, Latin America, Asia and the former Soviet bloc, fellowships are contributing massively for example to the improvement of the standards of journalism in those countries.

Comments

[Bob Giles]

Dear Bruno,

Thanks for your comments reinforcing the value of mid-career fellowships.

I'm not sure, however, where you obtained the numbers of US Nieman applicants. We told the NY Times that:

In 2006, there were 100 applicants for 14 fellowships.

In 2007, there were 91 applicants for 15 fellowships.

For the international fellowships:

In 2006, there were 121 applicants for 14 fellowships.

In 2007, there were 149 applicants for 14 fellowships.

Moreover, the numbers don't really tell the story. The quality of the applicant pool gets better every year. This means it is more difficult to select a group of finalists to be interviewed and more difficult to select those who receive fellowships.

Best regards,

Bob Giles
Curator
Nieman Foundation for Journalilsm

[Bob Calder]

What about perceptions of journalism created by Fox and CNN and the rising tide of invective-as-comment?

[BrunoG]

Thank you Bob (Giles) for clarifying the figures concerning the Nieman Fellowship, I've amended the post accordingly (and I would welcome a figure for 2005 if you can release one). Indeed, figures are only part of the story, and you're right to underscore that the Fellowships remain very competitive.
Bob (Calder): yes, that approach is helping, as I wrote, to suffocate the true values of US journalism. I used the Paris Hilton example but I could as well have used the Brit Hume-Lou Dobbs example, to me they're facets of a same downward-spiral phenomenon.

[Bob Giles]

Bruno,

The Nieman Foundation received 111 U.S. applications in 2005 and awarded 12 fellowships.

Bob

[Jim Bettinger]

Bob Giles is right about the quality of applicants, which continues to get better each year, making the process more competitive, even though the numbers are down. And even though we don't really know why people don't apply — they don't have to tell us! — we do know anecdotally that some newspapers and broadcasters are not permitting their best candidates to take a leave of absence, and that other potential applicants simply don't want to be off the radar screen in these tumultous times. The working group that Bruno refers to above is the Knight Fellowships effort to think creatively about how a journalism fellowship program can best serve the craft and business of journalism, without abandoning its core values.

Jim Bettinger
Director
John S. Knight Fellowships for Professional Journalists
Stanford

[Mark Grabowski]

Good article. I run a website for young journalists that lists several fellowship opportunities. So, if you do know anyone looking for a fellowship, please refer them to http://CubReporters.org

[Robyn]

Funny, I'm looking into fellowships as a way to recapture the fire that the newly-minted grad has and find a space for a true specialty.
I would ask that one place Neiman look is its requirements for community journalism (daily, 50K+ circ) and ask, does this truly benefit the main consumers of community journalism, the suburban and rural weekly reader?
The weekly is struggling, because so many are competing with dailies.
When so much of the effort is focused on staying afloat, the writers have less space and time to look into what matters: the changing face and pace of their beat.

I will apply for 2009, probably for a few different fellowships.
I will have to go to my editors, hat in hand and beg for the time away. I will do this, with a measure of fear in my heart, knowing that the paper can survive without me (as is true of any journalist)and might decide to do just that.
But, I will apply knowing that if this company does not see my value, another will, especially as a Fellow.

[Dhruba Sapkota]

To,The Director/Chief of the InstitutionMedia Co-ordinatior Dear Sir/MadamI am Dhruba Raj Sapkota in Kathmandu Nepal. I work for Radio Nepal as Broadcast Journalist.My request is that, if you have schedule to conduct any programs based on broadcast journalism under fellowship program and conferences,workshop seminar & trainings in long or short term basis.I am interested to attend on those subjects which is meet me fit one.
I would like to gain further-more knowledge by sharing new ideas, views and experiences with different media persons. The opportunity would be benificial my self, my organization and it's listeners.If so send me an application form and broucher. Dhruba Raj SapkotaNews Reporter/Broadcast JournalistRadio Nepal(National Broadcasting Station)POBOX: 634SinghadurbarKathmandu,NepalEmail: sapkotadrs

[santos ojha]

dear sir/madam
i am santos ojha from nepal i am a sport journalist in nepal.i have been working in radio nepal since 1992.Do you have a any fellowship sport journalism training for neapal? thanks.

santos ojha
nepal